LAYER 1: PLANETARY FOUNDATIONS

Climate System

The two interconnected boundaries driven by atmospheric CO2 – Climate Change and Ocean Acidification.

In 30 Seconds

Two planetary boundaries share the same driver – atmospheric CO2:

  • Climate Change– Atmospheric CO2 and radiative forcing (the “warming” boundary)
  • Ocean Acidification– CO2 absorption by oceans (the “other CO2 problem”)

Climate Change is already crossed (since ~1988). Ocean Acidification is approaching but not yet breached. Both will continue to worsen until we achieve net-zero emissions – making decarbonisation the defining business transformation of our era.

Where This Fits

This page covers two of the nine planetary boundaries – the “climate-related” boundaries that together govern Earth's energy balance and ocean chemistry.

The Nine Boundaries – Climate Cluster

CLIMATE-RELATED (This Page)

  • Climate Change
  • Ocean Acidification

OTHER BOUNDARIES

  • Biosphere Integrity
  • Land-System Change
  • Freshwater Change
  • Biogeochemical Flows
  • Novel Entities
  • Stratospheric Ozone
  • Atmospheric Aerosols

These two boundaries share a common driver: atmospheric CO2. Every tonne of CO2 emitted both warms the atmosphere and acidifies the oceans. This is why decarbonisation addresses both boundaries simultaneously.

The Two Interconnected Boundaries

Climate Change has been crossed for decades. Ocean Acidification is approaching its limit. Both are driven by anthropogenic CO2 emissions.

1. Climate Change

CROSSED

Atmospheric CO2 concentration and radiative forcing – the fundamental driver of global warming

What It Measures

  • CO2 concentration: Parts per million (ppm) of CO2 in atmosphere
  • Radiative forcing: Energy imbalance (W/m²) driving warming
  • Global temperature: Deviation from pre-industrial baseline

Current Status

  • CO2: ~425 ppm (boundary: 350 ppm) – 21% over
  • Radiative forcing: ~2.9 W/m² (boundary: 1.0 W/m²)
  • Temperature: +1.2°C above pre-industrial (2024)
  • Crossed since approximately 1988

The Paris Agreement Context

The 1.5°C and 2°C targets from Paris correspond to different levels of boundary transgression. At 1.5°C, we remain in a “zone of increasing risk.” Beyond 2°C, we enter “high risk” territory with potential tipping points: ice sheet collapse, permafrost methane release, Amazon dieback. Current policies trajectory: 2.5–2.9°C by 2100.

Business Relevance

Climate change creates both physical risks (extreme weather, sea level rise, supply chain disruption) and transition risks (policy changes, technology shifts, market repricing). Every company faces decarbonisation pressure through regulation (CSRD, SEC), investor expectations (TCFD/ISSB), customer demands, and competitive positioning. Science-based targets (SBTi) now cover companies representing >35% of global market cap.

2. Ocean Acidification

APPROACHING

CO2 absorption by oceans – the “other CO2 problem” that threatens marine ecosystems

What It Measures

  • Aragonite saturation: Availability of calcium carbonate for shell-building organisms
  • Ocean pH: Acidity level (lower = more acidic)
  • Carbonate chemistry: Balance of dissolved carbon species

Current Status

  • Aragonite saturation: ~84% of pre-industrial (boundary: ≥80%)
  • pH decline: -0.1 units since 1800 (30% more acidic)
  • CO2 absorption: Oceans absorb ~25% of anthropogenic emissions
  • Approaching but not yet crossed

Why It Matters

Ocean acidification threatens calcifying organisms: corals, shellfish, plankton. These form the base of marine food webs. Coral reefs support 25% of marine species and protect coastlines worth trillions. Unlike warming, which can theoretically be reversed with cooling, ocean chemistry changes persist for thousands of years. This is an irreversibility issue.

Business Relevance

Direct exposure for fisheries and aquaculture (shellfish industry particularly vulnerable),coastal tourism (reef degradation), and coastal property (reduced storm protection). Indirect exposure through marine ecosystem degradation affecting global protein supply. Often overlooked in corporate climate strategies focused solely on temperature.

Why These Boundaries Are Interconnected

Both boundaries are driven by the same root cause: anthropogenic CO2 emissions.

The Carbon Pathway

~40 Gt

Annual CO2 emissions

~45%

Stays in atmosphere
(Climate Change)

~25%

Absorbed by oceans
(Acidification)

(Remaining ~30% absorbed by land ecosystems)

Shared Driver

Every tonne of CO2 emitted contributes to both warming (atmosphere) and acidification (ocean). Decarbonisation is the solution to both.

Compounding Effects

Warmer oceans absorb less CO2 (more stays in atmosphere), but absorbed CO2 acidifies faster in warmer water. Climate change accelerates acidification.

Different Timescales

Atmospheric warming could theoretically be reversed through cooling. Ocean chemistry changes persist for millennia. Acidification is less reversible.

Feedback Loops

Ocean acidification weakens marine carbon sinks (coral, shellfish, plankton), reducing future CO2 absorption capacity, accelerating atmospheric accumulation.

The Implication

There is no pathway to solving either boundary without addressing CO2 emissions at source. Adaptation is necessary but insufficient. Mitigation – rapid, deep decarbonisation – is the only response that addresses root cause. This is why net-zero commitments and science-based targets have become the central organising framework for corporate climate action.

How This Maps to Practitioner Categories

Professional bodies like ISEP use “Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation” as a practice area. This page explains the planetary science that practice area addresses.

ISEP: Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation

This practice area spans multiple layers of our framework:

LayerClimate Content
L1: Planetary FoundationsClimate Change + Ocean Acidification boundaries (this page)
L4: Policy & GovernanceUNFCCC, Paris Agreement, NDCs, carbon pricing, CBAM
L5: Corporate ActionGHG accounting, SBTi, TCFD/ISSB, transition planning
Capital FlowsCarbon markets, green bonds, climate finance

The Pandion Perspective

Climate practitioners often focus on emissions accounting and target-setting (L5) or policy engagement (L4). Understanding the underlying planetary science (L1) provides context for why certain thresholds matter and what's at stake if they're breached. It's the difference between compliance and strategic conviction.

Business Risks & Opportunities

Physical Risks

Direct impacts from changing climate

  • Acute: Extreme weather events, flooding, wildfires, storms
  • Chronic: Sea level rise, water scarcity, temperature shifts
  • Supply chain: Agricultural disruption, infrastructure damage
  • Operations: Cooling costs, water availability, asset stranding
  • Insurance: Rising premiums, coverage withdrawal in high-risk areas

Transition Risks

Impacts from shifting to low-carbon economy

  • Policy: Carbon pricing, CBAM, mandatory disclosure, phase-outs
  • Technology: Stranded assets, obsolete processes, new competitors
  • Market: Shifting customer preferences, green premiums
  • Reputation: Greenwashing accusations, activist pressure, talent flight
  • Legal: Climate litigation, fiduciary duty claims

Scope 1

Direct emissions from owned/controlled sources

Fuel combustion, fleet, industrial processes

Scope 2

Indirect emissions from purchased energy

Electricity, heating, cooling, steam

Scope 3

All other indirect emissions (value chain)

Supply chain, product use, investments

The Opportunity Frame

Climate transition creates massive market opportunities: renewable energy, efficiency technology, low-carbon products, carbon removal, climate adaptation services. Companies leading the transition capture market share, attract talent, and reduce long-term risk exposure. The first-mover advantage in decarbonisation is significant and time-limited. Companies setting science-based targets now are positioning for the economy of 2030–2050.

Who Works on Climate Systems

Science & Research

Understanding the climate system

IPCC, WMO, NOAA, Met Office, universities, research institutes

What is happening and what will happen?

International Governance

Global coordination and agreements

UNFCCC, COP process, Paris Agreement, IPCC Working Groups

What should the world do collectively?

Standards & Frameworks

Translating science to action

SBTi, GHG Protocol, CDP, TCFD/ISSB, ISO 14064

How should organisations measure and commit?

Carbon Markets

Pricing and trading mechanisms

EU ETS, Verra, Gold Standard, ACR, CAR, national schemes

How do we price emissions and fund mitigation?

Technology & Solutions

Mitigation and adaptation

Renewables, efficiency, electrification, CCUS, adaptation tech

What technologies enable decarbonisation?

Finance & Investment

Mobilising capital for transition

Climate funds, green bonds, transition finance, GFANZ members

How do we fund the net-zero transition?

The Pandion View

Climate change is the most recognized planetary boundary because its impacts are already visible and its solutions – decarbonisation – drive the largest economic transformation in history.

But climate is not the whole story. Ocean acidification shows that even if we solved warming, CO2 emissions would still degrade marine ecosystems. And climate solutions that ignore other boundaries – like biofuels driving deforestation – can make the overall situation worse. Systemic thinking matters.

We help clients understand climate in context: the science that defines boundaries, the policy that translates them into requirements, and the business transformation needed to respond. See also Biosphere & Living Systems – the life-related boundaries that climate change increasingly threatens.

Sources: Stockholm Resilience Centre (Planetary Boundaries 2023 update), IPCC AR6, Global Carbon Project, NOAA, SBTi, ISEP Policy & Practice Areas. This content is for educational purposes. For specific guidance, consult appropriately qualified professionals.